Comparison of the Works of Andy Warhol and James F. Gill Essay Example For Students

Comparison of the Works of Andy Warhol and James F. Gill Essay The colors on his pallet for this particular work are yellow, blue-violet, and violet. Yellow and violet are complimentary colors; the blue-violet tones used were done by mixing the primary color blue and the secondary color violet to create the tertiary color blue-violet. This selection of color makes for a nice composition that gives the work a sense of harmony. This leads me to believe that his colors were well thought out when being chosen, The first application of ink was done in black. This part of the print only captures the dark shadows to the figure, leaving the rest to the composition o be filled in with color. By doing this, Warhol created the illusion of light and shadow. When the colors were added, Warhol chose blue-violet for the face of Mao, Yellow for his button up shirt, and violet for the background. The placement of these colors could be interpreted in a number of ways am sure. According to The Biography Channel Website, Mao TTS-Tune left a controversial legacy in both China and the West as a genocidal monster and political genius (The Biography Channel) Therefore, being that Warhol chose to use the blue-violet on the face of Mao, it gives a cold impression much like the character of Mao himself. Warhol took his image Of Mao from the cover Of the Quotations from Chairman Mao TTS-Tune, produced in millions of copies. He created multiple versions Of Mao screen printed onto canvas Of various sizes, Which became increasingly painterly. This gesturer quality was also evident in the 1972 print version of ten works that feature handrail marks around the head of Mao and unevenly inked colors. (National Gallery of Australia) As said previously, this is a simple forward facing portrait of Mao from the shoulders up. Although the position Of the figure is not uncommon, the chosen colors and the expression on Mayos face are. The slight mischievous squint in the eyes Of the leader depicts a sense of arrogance. It is almost threatening. He has a smile which resembles more of a smirk. The combination of the two sends a message Which to me says, Dont even think about it, Ill kill you. This portrait portrays Mao TTS-Tune, the communist Chinese leader known for his violence. Warhol was able to convey the characteristics of Mao through his use of color and composition. As an outside viewer of his work, this piece tells a story off sadistic but infamous leader. The National Gallery of Australia (NAG) tells us how Mr.. Warhol came upon his subject matter. Always keen for new subject matter, developments in American foreign policy presented Warhol with a new celebrity. In 1972 President Nixon made his first official trip to China ? a country that had been unrecognized by many in the West ever since the Communist Revolution of 1949. There Nixon met the Chinese Communist leader, Chairman Mao Sedona, heralding a new era of diplomacy. This event and the figure of Mao provided a new icon for the artist someone who was recognizable to millions, and therefore a sure money spinner This was a serious consideration for an artist always keen to become richer. National Gallery of Australia) It was stated in a Youth video documentary created by Matthew Cowlings that, N/roll was interested in glamour and the magic about being a star. (Matthew Cowlings) Therefore, Mayos power as a political leader and the degree of violence that he portrayed worked as motivators for him to be used in the work of Andy Warhol. The second piece of work that am going t o discuss is Candy Apple Chick II by James Gill. This piece consists of a portrait of a woman looking up, repeated three times along the top 1/3 of the canvas. She is surrounded by a flat but loud orange, trimmed in a rich blue. The remaining 2/3 of the canvas is the lower half of a woman from her shoulders down, stepping out of a car. This portion of the image is sectioned off in the shape off rectangle, and flooded with a blue-green. It is surrounded by the same orange as the portraits above it, All of the subject matter was done in graphite pencil. Artist: James Francis Gill Title: Candy Apple Chick II, 1966 Size: 60 ex. Medium: Graphite and lacquer on canvas The colors chosen for this creation are orange, blue, and blue-green. All of the colors are flat and saturated. Andy Warhol and His Soup Cans EssayHe combined the two into an illustration. His art work as well as Whorls was meant to be discussed, interpreted, and corroborated. Subsequently, Warhol and Gill shared a lot peculiarities in their works. They both utilized the vibrant colors, everyday images and scenes and techniques of illustrative and commercial art. These two artists produced works during the same art movement. Both artists were included in the world-famous SAA Paulo g exhibit in Brazil, Which established the hierarchy of the Pop Art icons. The two were in the same places at the same time. Or were they? Though they have many similarities, they are also packed full Of differences. Let me begin by kicking around their subject matter. Andy Warhol was very well known for his portraits Of the celebrities Of his time. He made it a point to keep up With the world, so much that as stated in Matthew Cowlings documentary, Malarial made a new self to fit the new world. In contrast, Garners Gill painted images of current events, everyday scenes, and even Marilyn Monroe (which preceded Whorls Marilyn Monroe). However, Gill was much more painterly in style. He dealt with his subjects in a manner that was too emotionally loaded for him to be considered just a Pop artist Los Angles Times Editor Henry J. Selves. Gill himself stated in a documentary, none of the rich and famous people were ever happy, Consequently, in 1972 at the peak of his tame, Gill went into a self-imposed exile in California to improve his artistic form and expression without material trappings. That being said, it shows the different mind sets of these two artists and why they produced such different works. Warhol was gunning for the fame and fortune, and Gill was trying to get away from it. Warhol changed himself to please the media, while Gill chose to flee in order to find himself again, Lets now consider the different materials and mediums chosen by each artist. Andy Warhol was associated faith screen printing, which is the process that he used on his portrait of Mao. The print was done on Becket High White Paper and consisted of 4 different colors of ink. Mr.. Warhol worked with a number of tedium but was very proficient in screen printing. At the height of his fame as a painter, Warhol had several assistants vivo produced his silk-screen multiples, following his directions to make different versions and variations. The Philosophy Of Andy Warhol) James Gill however, was not yet into the process Of screen printing. Screen printing is a technique that he later became interested in and even stated in a documentary, man Wish I would have done that, in reference to Whorls work. [James Gill Full Circle) Gills work consisted of drawing and painting. In the artwork being di scussed, Candy Apple Chick II, he seed graphite pencil and lacquer, which are much different materials than used in Whorls Mao TTS-Tune. It was drawn on canvas. The mediums chosen by Gill and Warhol each required a different level of skill and technique. The subject matter in the work of Andy Warhol leaned more towards popularity, fame, and glamour, whereas the work of James Gill involved much more emotion and feeling. Different agendas were on the minds of each artist. Though Gill wanted to pursue his artwork, he wanted to do it his way. He wanted to be happy doing it. Andy Warhol wanted the tame and fortune. He molded himself to fit the expectations of society. So you see no artist is one in the same, and neither are their works of art To cut a long story short, though artists are capable of producing similar works of art during the same time period, doesnt mean they were thinking the same thoughts. Just because two pieces of art look similar in nature does not mean that the same mediums were used. Granting that each artist avgas considered a Pop Artist, they each defined Pop Art in their own via,h Every artist is unique in their own way. That is what separates them from everyone else. Andy Warhol could have added more emotion into his artwork, UT he didnt.